🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding that comments delivered by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was understandable. Instead, he brought up the continued absence of US male players at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose the American had beaten the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). He stated in press after the loss that he actually preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is ranked number four in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over No 3 the German with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite delivery and concussive power on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The past few years has witnessed the curious emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly surged to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing slump of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's play in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a terrible service game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of Djokovic, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly seem like he believed he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is those who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only say how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for all other players. {